F.A.Q. for Contributors<\/a><\/p>\nFeedback<\/b> is a weblog publication of Open Humanities Press, a community of critics dedicated to writing at the generative interfaces between<\/b> established disciplinary, institutional, and social territories and protocols. The weblog format is the electronic realization of the interactions within a critical community that has communicated along networks and rhizomes of deliberation for some time already. As such, this instrument welcomes theoretically and philosophically-informed posts in a variety of media and formats rendering critique on the noteworthy trends, sea-changes, and catastrophes of our day.<\/p>\n
Posts, in keeping with the conventions of the weblog medium, could well vary from original thought-pieces to reviews of books, films, exhibitions, theater, performance-works, music, and on to reports: on new media and technologies, institutional developments, conferences, and related happenings of significance to the critical and educational communities. The editors imagine two formats for customary posts: 200-500 words for reviews, reports, and notes on \u201cactual\u201d happenings; 500-2000 words for elaborated contributions of thinking and critique. In very different ways, past experiments including the Romantic fragment, Baudelaire\u2019s art criticism, Barthes\u2019s \u201cmythologies,\u201d and Benjamin\u2019s Denkbilder<\/i> hold untold wisdom for the Feedback<\/b> community.<\/p>\n
Feedback <\/b>is topically organized by desks whose editors (\u201cchiefs\u201d) welcome posts of 250-2000 words.<\/p>\n
Feedback<\/b> is configured in such a fashion that authors, along with the texts of their posts, submit a relevant image serving as the logo both signaling and coalescing their intervention. The editors hope that this added dimension to the submission proves to be a dynamic visual correlative to the discursive synthesis involved. It makes provision for bibliographical documentation at the end of posts, but not for standard academic footnotes.<\/p>\n
On the basis of this shared understanding, Feedback<\/b> encourages cultural critics and writers from a variety of disciplinary outlooks and media orientations to submit their posts to the most a propos desks. Desk chiefs managing the interest-areas into which Feedback<\/b> is divided are the following. In the case of co-edited desks, please submit prospective posts to both<\/b> desk chiefs.<\/p>\n
Guidelines for Editors and Authors<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Call\/Appel\/\u5f81\u96c6\/Ruf\u2014for Posts F.A.Q. for Editors F.A.Q. for Contributors Feedback is a weblog publication of Open Humanities Press, a community of critics dedicated to writing at the generative interfaces between established disciplinary, institutional, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-262","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/openhumanitiespress.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/openhumanitiespress.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/openhumanitiespress.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openhumanitiespress.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openhumanitiespress.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=262"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/openhumanitiespress.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":267,"href":"https:\/\/openhumanitiespress.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/262\/revisions\/267"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/openhumanitiespress.org\/feedback\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}